Assessment of Goal Attainment Scaling in the Community Based Rehabilitation Setting: A Pilot Study

Authors

  • Muhammad Khan Institute of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Nabila Soomro Institute of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sabeena Jalal Vice Dean, School of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Outcome measure, goal attainment scaling, community based rehabilitation

Abstract

Background

Outcome measures in physiotherapy are multi dimensional hence, may not estimate the individualized goals of patients with varying complaints. To make a quantitative, individual assessment of patients in a community is even more challenging. Therefore, assessment measure such as goal attainment scaling (GAS) acts as a better tool of measurement.

Objective

To assess feasibility of goal attainment scaling (GAS) as used by physiotherapists in a community based ehabilitation setting.

Method

This is a quantitative pilot study with pre and post intervention data evaluation using GAS. The author selected 10 consecutive patients, of different diagnosis, from referred patients waiting list and handed over to physiotherapists who gave informed consent to apply GAS scale.

Results

A total of 10 patients data were collected. The mean age of patients was 80.4 years. Patients with lower quadrant complaints showed a marked improved in GAS scores. A total of 19 goals were identified , out of which 8 goals were achieved at expected level; 6 failed to reach the expected level and 5 were superseded the expected level of performance. Feedback from physiotherapists suggested that GAS is a useful measure for community based rehabilitation (CBR) in a low income setting.

Conclusion

GAS proves to be a responsive measure in CBR setting. GAS provides clarity of goals for the physiotherapists, patients and hence, their families. GAS seems to have good psychometric properties but the concern with its use is therapist may set goals which are too easy to achieve for the patient. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Austin C, Clark CR. Measures of outcome: for whom? Br J Occup Ther 1993; 56:21–4.

Frank-stromborg M, Olsen S. Instruments for Clinical Healthcare Research, 3rd ed. 2004.

Smith A, Cardillo JE, Smith SC, Amézaga AM. Improvement scaling (rehabilitation version). A new approach to measuring progress of patients in achieving their individual rehabilitation goals. Medical care. 1998; 36:333–47.

Kiresuk T, Sherman R, Health J. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programmes. Community Ment Health J. 1968; 4:443–53.

Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46:1113–8.

Rockwood K, Howlett S, Stadnyk K, Carver D, Powell C, Stolee P. Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56:736–43.

Pallsano R. Validity of Goal Attainment Scaling in Infants with Motor Delays. Phys Ther. 1993; 73:651–60.

Rushton PW, Miller WC. Goal attainment scaling in the rehabilitation of patients with lower-extremity amputations: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:771–5.

Goodyear DL, Bitter JA. Goal attainment scaling as a program evaluation measure in rehabilitation. J Appl Counsel. 1974; 5:19–26.

Stolee P, Rockwood K, Fox RA, Streiner DL. The use of goal attainment scaling in a geriatric care setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40:574–8.

Stolee P, Stadnyk K, Myers AM, Rockwood K. An individualized approach to outcome measurement in geriatric rehabilitation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999; 54:641–7.

Malec JF, Smigielski JS, DePompolo RW. Goal attainment scaling and outcome measurement in postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 72:138–43.

Natasha L. Goal attainment scaling allows program evaluation of a home-based occupational therapy program. Occup Ther Health Care. 2003; 17:43–54.

Mitchell T, Cusick A, Evaluation of client-centred paediatric rehabilitation programme using goal attainment scaling. Aust Occup Ther J. 1998; 45:7–17.

Nelson CE, Payton OD. The planning process in occupational therapy: perceptions of adult rehabilitation patients. Am J Occup Ther. 1997; 51:576–83.

Northen JG, Rust DM, Nelson CE, Watts JH. Involvement of adult rehabilitation patients in setting occupational therapy goals. Am J Occup Ther. 1995; 49:214–20.

Young A, Harvais V, Joy D, Chesson R. Occupational Therapy: Made to measure. British J Therapy Rehabil. 1997; 4:26–30.

Forbes DA. Goal Attainment Scaling. A responsive measure of client outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs. 1998; 24:34–40.

Clark MS, Caudrey DJ. Evaluation of rehabilitation services: the use of goal attainment scaling. Int Rehabil Med. 1983; 5:41–5.

Ottenbacher KJ, Cusick A. Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. Am J Occup Ther. 1990; 44:519–25.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-25

How to Cite

Khan, M. ., Soomro, N. ., & Jalal, S. . (2012). Assessment of Goal Attainment Scaling in the Community Based Rehabilitation Setting: A Pilot Study. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences (JDUHS), 6(3), 100–105. Retrieved from https://jduhs.jduhs.duhs.edu.pk/index.php/jduhs/article/view/1493

Issue

Section

Original Articles